


This week’s Wine Spectator Insider spotlights the wines of France’s Rhône Valley from the tremendous 2005 vintage. These are James Molesworth’s most recent tasting notes for wines which were not released in time to be included in his annual Rhône Valley tasting report, which appears in the Nov. 30 issue of Wine Spectator, on newsstands now.
“2005 is a great vintage, like ’89,” said Michel Tardieu of Tardieu-Laurent about the current release. He notes that both were drought-influenced years that were warm early, but cooled down later in the growing season, which led to very rich tannins and excellent acidity. That structure—ripe, authoritative and well-embedded in the vintage’s ripe fruit—is the hallmark of 2005, a superb vintage up and down the Rhône Valley...
There are also some additional 2005 Châteauneuf-du-Papes here, including Domaine Vacheron-Pouizin... And as always, you’ll find the best of this week’s wines, including three classic-rated red Châteauneufs, among the Hot Wines (below).
Very dark and juicy, with currant paste, fig, briar and cassis bush notes pushed by a deep, loamy undertow. Finishes with raspberry ganache, graphite and sweet spice hints, while also showing great cut. Drink now through 2030.—J.M.
Super silky and alluring, with lush boysenberry and blueberry fruit riding along creamy textured tannins through a long spice and fruitcake filled finish. Hypermodern, and totally delicious. Drink now through 2009.—J.M.
Dark and winey, with aromas and flavors of warm raspberry and fig sauce, fruitcake, licorice and sweet spice. Juicy finish stretches out nicely. Drink now.—J.M.
Big, modern styled wine, packed with fig, currant preserve and raspberry ganache flavors, along with a dark toast and mocha-filled finish. But then the finish is cream, pure and filled with minerality. Impressively rendered. Drink now through 2009.—J.M.
Gloriously pure, with a massive core of boysenberry and blueberry fruit that glides effortlessly over seamless but dense tannins. Plenty of additional charcoal, fruitcake, mocha and fig paste notes chime in on the back end, extending the lengthy, well-structured finish. Really stunning. Best from 2009 through 2032. From France.—J.M.
This delivers mouthfilling mocha, blackberry confiture, fig paste and licorice flavors, with loamy tannins and lots of bittersweet cocoa and coffee on the finish. Despite its heft, this is polished and driven, showing the strength of this great vintage. Best from 2009 through 2032. From France.—J.M.
Wine Spectator reviews more than 12,000 wines each year; our senior editors comprise the most experienced staff of professional wine tasters of any publication in the world. Each editor specializes in the wines of specific regions; their initials identify the taster of each wine reviewed.
We always taste wines blind, in our offices in San Francisco, Napa, New York and Tuscany, and in the vineyard regions of Europe. This is your guarantee that a wine’s reputation or price does not influence its score. We score wines using our 100-point scale, explained below.
James Laube Senior editor, Napa - Joined Wine Spectator in 1983. Tasting beat: California
Kim Marcus Managing editor, New York - Joined Wine Spectator in 1988. Tasting beat: Austria, Greece, Portugal, Southern France
Thomas Matthews Executive editor, New York - Joined Wine Spectator in 1988. Tasting beat: New York, Spain
James Molesworth Senior editor, New York - Joined Wine Spectator in 1997. Tasting beat: Loire Valley, Rhône Valley, South Africa, South America
Bruce Sanderson Tasting director, New York - Joined Wine Spectator in 1993. Tasting beat: Alsace, Burgundy, Champagne, Germany
Harvey Steiman Editor at large, San Francisco - Joined Wine Spectator in 1983. Tasting beat: Australia, New Zealand, Oregon, Washington
James Suckling European bureau chief, Italy - Joined Wine Spectator in 1981. Tasting beat: Bordeaux, Italy, Port
Tasting staff: Jo Cooke (Veneto), Tim Fish (California), Alison Napjus (Alsace), Daniel Sogg (New Zealand), MaryAnn Worobiec (California)
Wine Spectator’s 100-Point Scale
95–100 Classic
90–94 O Outstanding
85–89 Very good
80–84 Good
75–79 Mediocre
50–74 Not recommended

